CNN has become a complete laughingstock.
Contrary to their protestations that they’re an objective news source, heaps of evidence prove otherwise.
And now one CNN personality made an absurd move to boost Hillary Clinton.
The Clinton News Network is back to its old tricks.
CNN’s cringeworthy label as “the most trusted name in news” becomes funnier with each passing day.
Investigative journalism from the independent group Project Veritas has unearthed deep-seated bias at the network on numerous occasions.
The group got CNN anchors on camera admitting that the Russiagate hoax was a “big nothing-burger.”
Recently, CNN chairman Jeff Zucker was recorded on a conference call essentially directing the entire news division to focus on Trump and hammer the impeachment storyline.
Meanwhile, CNN is one of the many left-wing networks that run interference for the Democrats, particularly Hillary Clinton.
And CNN foreign correspondent Christiane Amanpour, a rabid leftist, hosted a panel discussion with Anita Hill, whose story has suddenly been rewritten by the leftist gatekeepers.
During the confirmation process for Justice Clarence Thomas, Anita Hill was at the center of the “high-tech lynching” perpetrated by the Democrats to derail Thomas’s ascension to the Supreme Court.
In the panel discussion, Amanpour asked Hill, “Do you believe that this country is misogynistic still, that it will not vote for a female?”
Amanpour’s question was specifically related to Hillary’s defeat in 2016.
This comes on the heels of whispers that Clinton is potentially laying the foundation for a late presidential push in 2020.
Amanpour is trying to reduce Clinton’s defeat to misogyny, which is precisely one of the excuses Clinton used after her humbling loss to Donald Trump.
Clinton even said that she lost because husbands told their wives to vote for Trump.
According to Clinton, women don’t have enough agency to vote against her.
It wasn’t because she was deeply dishonest, corrupt, and warmongering – no, women didn’t vote for her because their husbands said so.
Amanpour and Hill also lamented the existence of the electoral college, which Hillary lost to Trump.
In true leftist fashion, the CNN personality and Hill were prepared to discard constitutional norms for their short-sighted grip on power.
Democrats have already openly talked about disbanding the electoral college, censoring “hate speech” (i.e. anything that contradicts their points), and packing the Supreme Court.
This is just a taste of what a presidency under Hillary Clinton or one of the other unhinged Democrats might look like.
They don’t believe in freedom and they believe the Constitution is outdated.
In addition to the frightening rollback of individual rights, Clinton would likely have us in at least two new hot wars with her disastrous foreign policy.
Some Democrats are concerned about their weak slate of candidates, which is why Clinton is lurking in the weeds.
But the truth is, all the Democrats running for President would be terribly destructive for the country.