The New York Times has become the propaganda rag of #TheResistance.
“The paper of record” no longer hides its bias against Donald Trump and the Republicans.
Now The Times made an unprecedented move to stop Trump.
Big media outlets have pretended to be objective for years.
But deceased media pioneer Andrew Breitbart astutely pointed out that the corporate press is actually the Democrat Media Complex.
Newspapers, broadcast and cable news, and entertainment media are all slanted toward the Democrats.
Prior to the internet providing a landscape for conservative media to flourish, Fox News and talk radio were the only bulwarks against a complete media monopoly.
Now that the liberal mask has slipped and these institutions have shown their true colors, they’re barely hiding their naked partisanship.
In 2016, The New York Times made a bold move and openly endorsed Hillary Clinton.
And now they’re up to their old tricks.
The Times editorial board made a stunning move by endorsing Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar.
This is a desperate move by an institution that’s been gutted by leftist bias.
They’re so ensconced in their echo chamber, they don’t realize that their message rings hollow with most Americans.
Nevertheless, the liberals at The New York Times are so afraid of Trump, they’re doing all they can to prop up their candidates of choice.
The paper’s fawning praise of Warren included this passage:
“Senator Warren is a gifted storyteller. She speaks elegantly of how the economic system is rigged against all but the wealthiest Americans…Her campaign’s plans, in general, demonstrate a serious approach to policymaking that some of the other candidates lack.”
Saying Warren is a “gifted storyteller” is perhaps the most polite way ever of calling someone a liar.
Warren lied about having Native American ancestry, then she lied about it having no bearing on her career success, namely securing a teaching position at Harvard Law School.
However, records show that Warren was touted by the school as a minority faculty member.
Her hiring came in light of a big stink made by far-left Harvard professor Derrick Bell regarding the lack of diversity on the school’s faculty.
Warren has also been called out by other candidates and even softball interviewers for her lie that her insane policies can be paid for without raising middle class taxes one cent.
Her plans have also included a ridiculous wealth tax that would essentially confiscate assets from people.
The Democrats’ bold new plans are all from 1848 and include some form of coercion and confiscation.
The Times also pumped up Minnesota senator Amy Klobuchar, who has zero traction in the polls, as a candidate worth consideration.
The paper said of Klobuchar:
“The senator from Minnesota is the very definition of Midwestern charisma, grit, and sticktoitiveness. Her vision goes beyond the incremental. Given the polarization in Washington and beyond, the best chance to enact many progressive plans could be under a Klobuchar administration.”
This ignores the fact that Klobuchar has the reputation of being a tyrant to her staffers.
She allegedly threw a shoe at one of her team members in a fit of rage.
The paper also gives a clear insight into the mind of a leftist.
They can’t sell the people on progressivism because of “polarization,” so they need someone who can implement it against the will of the people.
The Times is nothing more than a leftist rag.
They’re working overtime to convince you it’s a great idea to give up your rights.
They claim Trump is a tyrant, but he’s not the one trying to take your money, your guns, or your right to speak.